Sandy Hook: the View from Mars

Sandy Hook Elementary School, 12/14/2012

Sandy Hook Elementary School, 12/14/2012

This week, in the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook, we’ve been hearing it over and over again, even more than we do at other times: children are precious, we say. They’re our most valuable natural resource. Indeed, Tim Beamer, a cousin of Dawn Hochsprung, late principal of Sandy Hook Elementary School, was quoted thus in a local Pittsburgh newspaper, Dec. 16th:

“Teachers, in general, are very special people,” he said. “To do that for a living takes a very unique individual. You’re taking care of other people’s children, and children are the most valuable resource on the face of the planet.”

On first impression, such observations strike us as not only true but obvious. And we ourselves may say such things as individuals, or families, or communities. And we may very well believe what we say. But what about our nation as a whole?

Sure, as a nation, we say children are our most valuable, precious natural resource. And we say that we do an awful lot of what we do as a nation for the sake of the children. But is it true?

Let’s imagine, for a few moments, that we’re visitors from Mars. Looking at America, what would we see?

  • As a nation, America encourages contraception as much as possible, so children who would otherwise exist won’t exist at all.
  • As a nation, America encourages abortion as much as possible, so that children who already exist won’t be born.
  • As a nation, America is raising more and more children in single-parent households, though such households are from three to five times more likely to be impoverished than households headed by a married couple.
  • As a nation, America is accumulating unimaginable debt that, at least in theory, will have to be repaid by the children who don’t exist yet but will be allowed to be born and will be more likely than earlier generations to be raised in poverty.

That’s what Martian visitors would see in our nation.

How valuable can children really be, if we don’t want them? How precious can they actually be, when we put intolerable burdens on their shoulders, doing little or nothing to help them to be able to carry them?

As individuals, families, communities, we do value children quite highly, because of our personal connections with certain children. As a nation, though — evidenced by our laws,  by our court cases, and by our behavior — do we value anything more cheaply than children?

Martian spectators might well conclude that, as a nation, America is — for some unfathomable reason or for no reason at all — engaged in slow-motion suicide. Lacking our personal connections, would they be drawing an unwarranted conclusion? Or, fooled by our affection for the children we know, are we as a nation just not facing up to the reality we have made?


About Author

  • goral

    The Martians would first need to learn the nuances of our present day language.
    In political and media speak, here are the words, terms and their meaning.

    Middle class – all those who get gov’t assistance.
    Working class – Unions
    Wealthy class- all those who earn their money working
    Family – “love” and cohabitation with anybody

    Single family – middle class but the gov’t is now a husband.

    Love – anything that makes you feel good
    Abortion – a reasonable and compassionate choice
    Debt – something that the wealthy class invented to enslave the middle class.

    Children – little beings who can move on their own outside the womb.
    They breathe at Planned Parenthood’s discretion and they

    prosper only when the NEA and Democrats will it.
    Can also include pets.

    “We’re doing it for the children” doesn’t mean that at all, you silly Martians.

  • Mindboggled

    Goral, I see you started sipping the eggnog a little early ths Christmas season.